Several software tools can help editors of online magazines to evaluate for the originality of article content, and in this capacity gear such as Copyscape are excellent. They allow an manager to ascertain if the article use has been copied or not necessarily and if so to what amount. The tools are wonderful with this.
Paraphrasing tools are also fantastic if you are a creative writer tangled for a synonym, but are not so good if you want to change an important body of text and want a tool to paraphrase it. The end results are usually nonsensical to readers. Writers that do this kind of thing sometimes have an original text, but no-one wants to read it.
If you think friends are not proficient enough to tackle your writing, you should consider using the services of professional academic proofreaders and editors. Proofreaders check for problems, and may not comment on the content of your work. They may not even comment on the amount of padding its content has. That being so you will want to hire the services on the proofreader-editor who will comment on unneeded pieces of text and give suggestions as to how your work could be improved.
You can ask the editor to simply change what is necessary or look for comments only. A good manager will be knowledgeable about the field you are writing in and often will also be able to check for plagiarism as sometimes it is obvious to the trained eye, as the published language changes when you use another woman’s words. A software tool might not be able to pick up on like changes to your written trend.
Of course it is best not to plagiarize, but sometimes this is executed inadvertently, as there is nothing more standard than paraphrasing. Citing a particular author and giving credit ratings for his/her work should be done as a matter not surprisingly. A good proofreader editor is much better than a software tool for tidying up and preparing your written work before it’s submitted.
Meant for academic writing, especially dissertations and PhD theses, you’ll need a human proofreader-editor to check work rather than a software tool. If you have someone whose written English provides great improvements over yours, then ask them to go through your work and make the info changes to grammar in addition to spelling. You have to have consistent punctuational, either US or Uk English except for quotations because you cannot change the punctuation in these.
It happens to be fine to use formatting equipment and spell checks, nonetheless if you are writing academic Native english speakers, it is likely that a grammar reading tool will not know how to overcome such writing, as it is absolutely not natural language or at a minimum not the natural speech the software tool has been programmed to accept as correct.